Legal Opinion

State v. Arguello

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1994No. 18387PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Justice.

James Arguello (Arguello) appeals his conviction and sentence for third offense driving while under the influence of alcohol (DUI).1 We affirm.

FACTS

Arguello was arrested for DUI on August 1, 1992. He was again arrested for DUI on October 16, 1992. The arraignment for both offenses was conducted before a law trained magistrate on December 4,1992. During the arraignment, Arguello’s attorney outlined the terms of a plea bargain. Arguello agreed to plead guilty to first offense DUI in both eases. State agreed to dismiss some additional charges and to concurrent sentencing in both…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Honomichl v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. SinnottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State v. BeltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State v. HeftelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. MouttetSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SatterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. RusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API