Legal Opinion
Ingham County v. Capitol City Lodge No 141 of the Fraternal Order of Police, Labor Program, Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 29, 2007No. Docket 263956PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtWhitbeck, C.J.
This case arose when respondents Ingham County (the county) and Ingham County Sheriff (the sheriff) disciplined Detective Laurie Siegrist, the division president of the charging party, Capitol Lodge No. 141 of the Fraternal Order of Police, Labor Program, Inc. (the union). The county and the sheriff charged that Detective Siegrist violated the sheriffs written work rules when, without prior authorization, she faxed to an attorney for the union an internal memorandum regarding a new policy that required all detectives to wear pagers while on and off duty. The union then filed a grievance for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Badiee v. Brighton Area SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Central Michigan University Faculty Ass'n v. Central Michigan UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Michigan Employment Relations Commission v. Reeths-Puffer School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ingham County v. Capitol City Lodge No 141 of the Fraternal Order of Police, Labor Program, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007