Legal Opinion

Kiven v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 27, 1985No. 84—1836PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson

In this personal injury action defendant Chicago and North Western Transportation Company filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 103(b) (87 Ill. 2d R. 103(b)) because of plaintiff’s failure to exercise due diligence in obtaining service of process after the statute of limitations had run. Plaintiff then filed a motion for voluntary dismissal. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 110, par. 2— 1009.) The trial court granted plaintiff’s motion and denied defendant’s motion. On appeal, defendant raises three issues: (1) whether an appeal may be taken from the granting of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kahle v. John Deere Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. LaBarge, Inc. v. Corn Belt BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Bernick v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  5. Dillie v. BisbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. AlexanderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API