Legal Opinion
Birbalas v. Cuneo Printing Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 25, 1944No. 8379PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Defendant appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiffs, certain of its employees, liquidated damages and attorneys’ fees in an action .brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216 (b), to recover compensation for overtime, liquidated damages and attorneys fees.
Prior to commencement of the suit, the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor sued to enjoin defendant from violating Sections 15(a) (1) and 15(a) (2) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 215(a) (1, 2). Subsequently, on December 9, 1940, four of the plaintiffs brought this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Wadley Southern Railway Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Guess v. MontagueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Biggs v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Watkins v. Hudson Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.