Legal Opinion
Rodgers v. Board of County Commissioners
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 25, 2013No. 12CA0457PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JUDGE WEBB
¶1 This case arises from disputes over Summit County's building regulations. Plaintiffs, Jason L. Rodgers and James R. Hazel, a same-sex couple, primarily contend the County treated them differently from heterosexual couples when interpreting and enfore-ing these regulations.
¶ 2 On appeal, plamtfifs argue that the trial court erred by dismissing two of their claims; entering a directed verdict in favor of the County on their inverse condemnation claim and on three of the four challenged actions within their single 42 U.S.C. § 1983 equal protection claim; and improperly…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Windsor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Price-Cornelison v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Board of County Comm'rs of Summit County v. RodgersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015