Legal Opinion
Board of County Comm'rs of Summit County v. Rodgers
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 8, 2015No. Supreme Court Case 13SC404PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eid
T1 Respondents Jason L. Rodgers and James R. Hazel ("Respondents") allege in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim that petitioner Summit County Board of County Commis-sgioners ("the County") violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution when it denied them a certificate of occupan-ey to their newly built home. The trial court. issued partial directed verdicts against Respondents on three of the four allegedly discriminatory actions they identified in support of their claim. On appeal, the court of appeals reversed, concluding that C.R.C.P. 50 does not permit partial directed verdicts,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado v. SharpSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Feiger, Collison & Killmer v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Hansen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Observatory Corp. v. DalySupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Board of County Commissioners of County of Weld v. DPG Farms, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2017