Wylie v. Kitchin
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
McCURN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, former recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children [“AFDC”], bring this action for declaratory and injunctive relief challenging the application of the so-called “lump sum rule.” 1 Plaintiffs’ AFDC benefits were terminated when plaintiff Jeannette Wylie received an unexpected lump sum of money. Plaintiffs contend that Congress intended the lump sum rule to apply only to those AFDC recipients who have earned income. As the plaintiffs have no earned income they allege that their' benefits were wrongfully terminated.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Project Release v. PrevostCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rivera v. Department of Public AidAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Society for Good Will to Retarded Children v. CuomoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Valmonte v. PeralesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Vermeulen v. KhederDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1984
- Davis v. ColerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.