Legal Opinion
Vermeulen v. Kheder
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided December 5, 1984No. K 82-135PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
This case presents a challenge to the “lump sum rule” whereby recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children benefits are denied eligibility if they acquire non-recurring lump sums. 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(17); 45 CFR 233.20(a)(3)(ii)(D) (1982). The lawsuit was filed by a destitute mother, Cindy Vermeulen, and a welfare rights group, the Michigan Welfare Rights Organization. The Court previously granted Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction enjoining the Defendant officials from applying the lump sum rule to Ms. Vermeulen pending the outcome of this…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coleman v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2004
- Williams v. DEPT. OF HRSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Childrens & Parents Rights Ass'n of Ohio, Inc. v. SullivanDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
- Tyrna v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Zarko v. Director, Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.