In Re Gentile, 5 Jd 94 (pa.ct.jud.disc. 7-11-1994)
Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence 1
On May 18, 1993, the electorate of this Commonwealth amended Article V, Section 18 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, thereby designing a new scheme for judicial discipline. At the time of the Amendment, there did not exist in Pennsylvania the crime of "misbehavior in office." Consequently, I do not believe that District Justice Gentile must automatically forfeit his office as requested by the Judicial Conduct Board.
The prior version of Article V, Section 18 was adopted in 1968. At that time, this Commonwealth recognized the common-law crime of "misbehavior in office." See, e.g., In re Braig,…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Depaul.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HarperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- In Re CainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Commonwealth v. GentileSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- In Re BraigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.