Legal Opinion

State v. Vines

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 23, 2004No. SC 16852PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

In this criminal appeal, we granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issues: “1. Should this court determine, in the exercise of its supervisory power over the administration of criminal justice, that a trial judge may not absent himself [or herself] from the courtroom during the playback of testimony? 2. If the answer to the first question is ‘yes,’ should [the defendant’s] conviction be reversed?” State v. Vines, 261 Conn. 943, 808 A.2d 1137 (2002). After fully considering the briefs and arguments of the parties, we affirm the judgment of…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. State v. VinesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. State v. VinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CruzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. State v. CrawleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. Vines v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. State v. EdwardsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API