Legal Opinion

Ronald Ragan, Jr. v. Reynolds & Reynolds Company

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 17, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00045Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION (DAYTON) RONALD RAGAN, JR., : Case No. 3:26-cv-00045 : Plaintiff, : District Judge Michael J. Newman vs. : Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry : REYNOLDS & REYNOLDS : COMPANY, : : Defendant. : REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the undersigned Magistrate Judge for a review of Plaintiff’s pro se Complaint. Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis (see Doc. No. 2), the Court must screen his Complaint and dismiss any part of it that is frivolous or malicious; that fails to state a claim on which relief…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API