Legal Opinion

United States v. New York Cent. R. Co.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided September 4, 1946No. Civ. No. 1273PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRENNAN, District Judge.

The plaintiff bases this action upon the provisions of the Safety Appliance Acts, 45' U.S.C.A. §§ 1-16. The facts are not in dispute and may be briefly summarized as follows:

The defendant, hereinafter referred to as the “Central” is a common carrier engaged in interstate commerce by railroad, and maintains a line of railroad track from the village of DeWitt, New York to the village of Rotterdam Junction, New York, where it connects with the tracks of the Boston and Maine Railroad Company, hereinafter referred to as the “Maine”.

Prior to the date of the alleged violation…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Lilly v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Linstead v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Hull v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1959
  2. Rodgers v. Conemaugh & Black Lick RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API