Cammarata v. Kelly Capital, LLC
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANK S. CAMMARATA, d/b/a Case No.: 3:17-cv-00346-BEN-AGS CAMMARATA ASSOCIATES, 12 ORDER GRANTING IN PART Plaintiff, 13 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR v. ATTORNEY’S FEES 14 KELLY CAPITAL, LLC; KELLY 15 [Doc. No. 99] ESCROW FUND V, LLC; and 16 MICHAEL R. KELLY, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees. For the reasons set 20 forth below, the motion is granted in part. 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 Plaintiff Frank S. Cammarata first brought suit against Defendants Kelly Capital, 23 LLC and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.