Legal Opinion
Hamill v. Smith
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided January 21, 1964No. File 114311PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, J.
This is an action seeking money damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligent operation of a motor vehicle. The complaint alleges that the defendant motor vehicle was a family car and specifies, among other allegations, that the defendant operator “operated said automobile when it was not equipped with brakes adequate to safely control its movement and wben said brakes were not in good and sufficient working order, and when said brakes did not comply with the requirement of the statute.” The answer admits the agency of the defendant operator but denies the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ebersole v. LowengrubSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- Ardoline v. KeeganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Turner v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Rathkopf v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- American Airlines, Inc. v. Ulen (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cartwright v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, NJLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Conner v. BrkichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Gillespie v. LawtonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1964
- Norwich Lumber Co. v. YatroussisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
- Ferrucci v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins., No. 34 22 07 (Aug. 25, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.