Legal Opinion
Christy v. Premo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 10, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Brown, J.), entered August 28, 1992 in Saratoga County, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to compel specific performance of a contract.
On April 3, 1992, the parties entered into a written contract for the sale of a one-family house owned by defendant located in the Town of Clifton Park, Saratoga County. Notably, paragraph 20 of the agreement provides as follows:
"This agreement is contingent upon Purchaser and Seller obtaining approval of this Agreement by their attorney as to *911all matters contained therein. This contingency shall be deemed waived…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kaplan v. LippmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- City of New York v. StackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Oneida City School District v. Seiden & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- Osprey L.L.C v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Magana v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Azriliant v. Eagle Chase AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- American Honda Finance Corp. v. One 2008 Honda PilotNew York Supreme Court · 2009
- Philippe Renee Nottebohm Magana and Mercantil Murchia, S.A. DE C v. v. Citibank, N.A. Citibank Texas, N.A. Citigroup, Inc and Ana Maria Nottebohm Magana, Individually and as of the Estate of Philippe Otto Nottebohm Dekkers, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014