Legal Opinion
United States v. Hong Vo
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 17, 2013No. Criminal No. 2013-0168PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Before the Court is [63] defendant Hong Vo’s renewed motion to dismiss for lack of venue, which the government opposes. Defendant Binh Vo joins the motion. [ECF No. 91]. In June 2013, Hong Vo filed a motion to dismiss the initial indictment in this case for improper venue. [ECF No. 54]. Before the Court ruled on that motion, a federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment. [ECF No. 61]. Following this development, Hong Vo renewed her motion to dismiss. [ECF No. 63]. On September 13, 2013, this Court conducted a hearing on the motion.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Nicholas SlattenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Mosquera-MurilloDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States v. Binh Tang VoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. Jeong Seon HanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- United States v. Rami GhanemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.