Legal Opinion

State v. Santiago

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 5, 2006No. 5D05-2162PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The State appeals from an order finding that double jeopardy bars Defendant Vidal Santiago from being retried for the murder of a fellow prison inmate, following a defense-requested mistrial. We reverse.

“The general rule is that when a mistrial is declared upon the defendant’s motion ... jeopardy does not attach and the defendant may be retried.” Rutherford v. State, 545 So.2d 853, 855 (Fla.1989) (citing McLendon v. State, 74 So.2d 656 (Fla.1954); State ex rel. Larkins v. Lewis, 54 So.2d 199 (Fla.1951)). “An exception occurs when the prosecution goads the defense into moving for a mistrial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Rutherford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. State Ex Rel. Larkins v. LewisSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  4. McLendon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  5. Cooper v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Delmoral v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Polk County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
  2. Ingram v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
  3. Richards v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API