Legal Opinion
Kirk v. McCallister
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 24, 1953No. A-11928PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
This habeas corpus proceeding presents for determination a question involving the interpretation of House Bill 243 of the 1947 Legislature which became a law on May 16, 1947, 2 O.S. 1951 §§ 737.1 to 737.13.
The petitioner, Einus Kirk, was charged by a verified complaint filed before Justice of the Peace Elmo McCallister of Oklahoma City, with “Offering for sale and selling uncandled eggs as “fresh eggs’.” Subsequent to the filing of the complaint, the petitioner was arrested, restrained by the sheriff of Oklahoma county, and this action was filed to secure his release from restraint on the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Little v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1934
- Delano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
- State v. NobleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1933
3Cited by4 opinions
- Modisett v. MarmadukeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964
- Samson Resources Co. v. CloudCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006