Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Clark

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Upshur County. Action by John W. McCullough against H. E. Clark. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Milleb, Judge:

In assumpsit plaintiff sought to recover damages laid in the declaration at $250,000.00, for the alleged breach by defendant of his oral contract made in April, 1915, to sell and transfer to plaintiff 760 shares of the stock of the Damascus Lumber Company, and of all his interest in said company, á Delaware corporation, alleged to be the legal or equitable owner of saw mills, timber, timber lands, railroads, rolling stock, and other property, located in the states of Virginia, Tennessee, and North Carolina, the legal title to some of which timber and timber lands was then vested…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Lipscomb's Adm'r v. CondonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Baker v. Oil Tract Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Hissam v. ParrishWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Bank v. Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCullough v. ClarkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Wallace v. Eclipse Pocahontas Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hardman v. PolinoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API