Legal Opinion
Danita McKenzie v. Thomas Cleveland, et al.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided February 9, 2026No. 2:23-cv-00002Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION DANITA MCKENZIE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 2:23-cv-00002-JHE ) THOMAS CLEVELAND, et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION1 Plaintiff Danita McKenzie (“McKenzie”), through her amended complaint, brings this action alleging violations of her rights under the Constitution and laws of the United States as well as the Constitution and laws of the State of Alabama. (Doc. 5). McKenzie named the following defendants in her amended complaint: Deputy Thomas Cleveland, Deputy J. Adams, and Deputy C. Wade.2…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.