Legal Opinion

United States v. Holmes

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided September 16, 1991No. ACMR 9002125PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HAGAN, Judge:

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of one specification of wrongful fraternization with an enlisted soldier, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982). The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of dismissal. The appellant now asserts that the staff judge advocate erred by mentioning new matter in the post-trial recommendation.

At trial, Private First Class (PFC) "Y,” the subordinate with whom the appellant was accused of having a sexual…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  3. United States v. NarineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. HeirsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. MeyerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. KomorousU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. GodfreyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API