Legal Opinion
Delgrosso v. Spang and Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 29, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-2672PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BLOCH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs were employed at the Ferroslag Division Plant of defendant Spang and Company in Lorain, Ohio, until on or about July 20, 1982, at which time said plant was closed by defendant. This action, brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (hereinafter referred to as “ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., and the Labor-Management Relations Act (hereinafter referred to as “LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 141, et seq., seeks certain pension benefits allegedly due the plaintiffs. 1 Plaintiffs’ complaint 2 contains four counts.
In Count I,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McLendon v. Continental Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
- Lindahl v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Bryant v. International Fruit Products Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985