Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Jordan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1905No. 5038PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Denney, J., entered June 27, 1903, upon findings of the court, after a trial on the merits without a jury, dismissing an action to recover assets of an insolvent corporation, distributed in fraud of creditors.

1Opinion of the Court

Fullerton, J. —

The appellant is the receiver of the Riverside Hardware Company, and brings this action on behalf of its creditors. The facts on which he relies to recover are not in dispute, and are, in substance, these: In the early part of the year 1899, W. H. Stevens and George M. Pillsbury contracted with a Mrs. Fuller for the purchase of a stock of hardware, then in the city of Everett, at the agreed price of $2,000. Hot having the means to make the purchase themselves, they induced the respondent, A. H. B. Jordan, to advance the sum of $1,800 towards the purchase price, and, when the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BookWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Watterson v. MastersonWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Herr v. SchwagerWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Barnard Manufacturing Co. v. Ralston Milling Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Brennan v. OliverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  4. Garrow v. FraserWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. City of Montesano v. CarrWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API