Jordan v. Hall
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
APODACA, Judge.
Defendant appeals an order denying his motion to set aside a foreign default judgment. The trial court determined that the state of Washington was the proper forum for a motion to set aside a default judgment from that state and denied the motion. Our second calendar notice proposed summary affirmance. Both parties have responded to that proposal. Not persuaded by Defendant’s arguments, we affirm.
Because the relevant facts are undisputed and the application of legal principles to the facts of this case is clear, we conclude disposition on the summary calendar is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Morris v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Rosenstein v. SteeleNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Noetzel v. Glasgow, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Conglis v. RadcliffeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Miller v. MorrisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- Rubin v. RubinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- WV 23 Jumpstart, LLC v. MynarcikNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2023
- Freedman v. Board of County Commissioners for Quay CountyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.