Legal Opinion
Conglis v. Radcliffe
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 24, 1995No. 21691PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Justice.
Richard Radcliffe, Jr., appeals the denial of his motion to set aside a Tennessee judgment filed in New Mexico under the Foreign Judgments Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 39-4A-1 to -6 (Repl.Pamp.1991). The issue on appeal is whether the Foreign Judgments Act authorizes relief by way of SCRA 1986, 1-060 (Repl.Pamp.1992) that is broader than the limitations imposed by the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution, Article IV, Section 1. The New Mexico Court of Appeals recently addressed this question in Jordan v. Hall, 115 N.M. 775, 858 P.2d 863 (Ct.App.1993),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jones v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Phares v. NutterArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- SUNWEST BK. OF ALBUQUERQUE v. RoderiguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Data Management Systems, Inc. v. EDP CORP.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mueller v. SampleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Nastro v. D'OnofrioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Williams v. CrutcherNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Rochester v. RochesterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Rubin v. RubinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.