Corrigan v. County of Calaveras
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS JAMES CORRIGAN, et al., No. 1:20-cv-00931-DAD-SKO 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 14 COUNTY OF CALAVERAS, et al., MOTIONS TO DISMISS 15 Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 17, 24) 16 17 18 This matter is before the court on two separate motions to dismiss. First, defendant 19 Joseph Boberg has moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ original complaint pursuant to Rule 4(m) and 20 Rule 12(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure due to insufficient service of process. 21…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.