Legal Opinion

Audio-Visual Coverage of Oles v. Houston

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided March 8, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lewis R. Friedman, J.

Whole Life Magazine (the applicant) has requested permission to take still photographs in the courtroom during the *1076trial of this and several related small claims actions. The application raises important questions that have not yet been discussed in the reported cases. During an "experimental” period, from December 1, 1987 through May 31, 1989, Trial Judges may permit "audio-visual coverage” of judicial proceedings. (See, Judiciary Law § 218, and implementing Rules of Chief Administrative Judge [22 NYCRR part 131; the Rule].) This case is apparently…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coopersmith v. GoldNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. Santiago, New York County Courts2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API