Legal Opinion
Greater Continental Corp. v. Schechter
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 3, 1970No. 522, Docket 34390PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. JOSEPH SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, Greater Continental Corporation (“Continental”) appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Marvin E. Frankel, Judge, denying a preliminary injunction to stay arbitration proceedings about to commence, which were initiated by the appellee (Schechter). Continental claims that the refusal of stay of the arbitration proceeding in this case fails to give effect to the intent of Congress expressed in the 1933 and 1934 securities acts, as recognized in Wilko v. Swan, 346 U.S. 427, 74 S.Ct. 182, 98 L.Ed.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Carcich v. Rederi A/B NordieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- A. & E. Plastik Pak Co., Inc. v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Maheu v. Reynolds & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,406 R. Stockton Rush, III v. Oppenheimer & Co., and Scott SeskisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Merritt Dickstein v. Edmond Dupont, as They Are Partners of Francis I. Dupont & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,365 Arthur Yale Kavit v. A. L. Stamm & Co., a Co Partnership, and Jack R. LevienCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Todd v. Oppenheimer & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.