Legal Opinion

State v. Standifur

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 19, 1987No. 136, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAULIFFE, Judge.

This case presents the question of whether a declaration against the penal interest of an unavailable witness, offered by the State against the accused in a criminal trial, is sufficiently reliable to qualify under the common law exception to the hearsay rule and to satisfy the Confrontation Clauses of the Constitution of the United States and the Declaration of Rights of Maryland.

The Appellees, Larry Ramoun Standifur and Colonel Hillard Henry, were indicted on various, criminal charges as accomplices in the same criminal episode, but were tried separately. Henry was tried by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. State v. MatuskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. State v. JonesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. West v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API