Nochowitz v. Ernst & Young

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

As prevailing party in this age discrimination action, Ernst & Young has filed a *60bill of costs seeking to tax unsuccessful plaintiff Stanley Nochowitz (“Nochowitz”) with an amount in excess of $19,000. This Court immediately issued a brief sua sponte memorandum order (the “Opinion”), 1994 WL 384014 in which it drew the attention of Ernst & Young’s counsel to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford Fitting Co. v. J.T. Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437, 107 S.Ct. 2494, 96 L.Ed.2d 385 (1987), which had flatly rejected the…