Deangelo Foote v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
A jury found appellant Deangelo Foote guilty of first-degree premeditated murder and of related firearms offenses after a trial in which the court struck certain opinion testimony of the government’s ballistics expert and instructed the jury to disregard it as a remedy and sanction for the government’s failure to disclose it to the defense in pretrial discovery as required by Criminal Rule 16(a)(1)(E). 1 Appellant contends this relief was inadequate, and that the trial judge abused his discretion by declining to grant him a mistrial instead. We disagree. We conclude that appellant failed to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. MechanikSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. David Thai, Lan Ngoc Tran, Minh Do, Jimmy Nguyen, Hoang Huy Ngo, Quang Van Nguyen, and Lv Hong, A/K/A "l.v. Hong"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gregory Trotter & Ernest Pee v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Pritchett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
- Shelton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
- Torney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
- Walker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024