Legal Opinion

Closson v. Seaboard Sand & Gravel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 20, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The law firm of Parsons, Closson & Mcllvaine seeks to recover the reasonable value of plaintiff Mcllvaine’s services as counsel for the trustees of the freeholders and commonalty of the town of Brookhaven, Suffolk county, New York, in an action brought to determine a claim to real property, it being alleged that the reasonable value of these services is at least $75,000, of which $17,500 has been paid, and that there is still a balance of $57,500.

A motion was made under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice (Subd. 4), to strike out the answer and direct the clerk of Trial Term, Part II, to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Gravenhorst v. . ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. H. C. King Motor Sales Corp. v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. Knapp v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Van Orman v. NelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Morello v. SpielvogelNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Breitbart v. WeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. Sarney v. OlenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API