Legal Opinion

Forster-Davis Motor Corp. v. Abrams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 14, 1936No. 22975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, the same as the order herein.

The plaintiff, by its petition in the court below, brought suit again? t the United Motor Company and W. C. Abrams, alleging an indebtedness due to it, evidenced by promissory notes of the United Motor Company, in the sum of $1,740, including interest thereon and 'attorney’s fees, aggregating $1,952.07, and that the defendant W. C. Abrams agreed to pay a part of this indebtedness, when “due and unpaid,” to the extent of $1,500.

A demurrer was filed to the petition by W. C. Abrams, in the argument…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  2. Johnson v. BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Hurst Hardware Co. v. GoodmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Mackey v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Welch v. MarvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reed v. Richards & Conover Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Gutowsky v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Fishman v. Las Vegas Sun, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API