Higgins v. Higgins

OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

Appellant Charles Higgins appeals from the trial court’s ruling that the decree of dissolution entered in this case is valid and that appellant is in arrears on the spousal maintenance owed under the property settlement agreement. We affirm.

The parties were divorced in October 1984 after a 16-year marriage. Appellee Suzanne Higgins was the petitioner in the marriage dissolution action. Appellant signed an acceptance of service of process but did not appear in the case, and the decree was entered after a default hearing. Incorporated in the decree is a lengthy property…