Legal Opinion

Sparks v. Saltillo Independent School Dist.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 28, 1929No. 3728PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the case as above). [1,2] The assignment first presented in appellant’s brief is as follows: “The court erred in sustaining plaintiff’s special exceptions to the defendant’s first amended original answer.” Appellee insists, and we agree, the assignment should not be considered, because too general. Rule 26 for the government of Courts of Civil Appeals is (in part) as follows: “Assignments of error which are expressed only in such.general terms as that the court erred in its rulings upon the pleadings, when there are more than one, * * * will not be regarded by the court as a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Stewart & ThreadgillTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  2. Chapman v. PettusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Yoe & Harris v. MontgomeryTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Foster v. BurginCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berryman v. NorfleetCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Texas Employers Insurance Association v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  3. Unique Illustrating Co. v. WithersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API