State v. Kenworthy
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BUDGE, Justice.
Appellant, Dean William Kenworthy, was convicted of the crime of grand larceny. This appeal is from the judgment and order denying appellant’s motion for new trial.
■ The action of the court in denying the motion for new trial is not assigned as error, neither is it discussed in appellant’s brief, nor was it argued at the hearing, therefore is not here for determination.
We will proceed to discuss the errors relied on for reversal of the judgment in the order in which they are stated in appellant’s brief.
The first error assigned attacks the sufficiency of the information upon two…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- State v. GilbertIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
- Hall v. JensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. VanekIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- People v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- State v. McDermottIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. RothIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1953