Legal Opinion

De Anza Enterrprises v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 2002No. H022088PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELIA, J.

After three and a half years of litigation, the trial court ordered specific performance of a term in a joint venture agreement allowing plaintiff Wade Hover to purchase the interest of defendant Joseph C. Johnson in the property owned by them as part of their joint venture, De Anza Enterprises. On appeal, Hover disputes the purchase price of Johnson’s interest, contending that the appraised value of the property should have been determined as of the date Johnson defaulted on his contractual obligation, the date Hover declared an intention to buy out Johnson, or at the latest,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Winet v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Morey v. VannucciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Taylor v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. Knupfer (In Re PW, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Burch v. Premier HomesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Nathanson v. NathansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Rowan Companies, Inc. v. Wilmington Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  5. Estate of DayanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API