Legal Opinion

Clark v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 2008No. 122 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Daniel and Debra Clark (the Clarks) appeal from the January 3, 2008, order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County (trial court) that denied the Clarks’ motion for post-trial relief requesting the removal of a compulsory nonsuit granted in favor of the Department of Transportation (DOT). We affirm.

This case arises from a tragic single-vehicle accident. On July 19, 2002, during a summer storm, Debra Clark was driving westbound on Street Road, a state highway located in Warrington Township; her nineteen-year-old son, Daniel, was riding in the front passenger’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Snyder v. HarmonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Dean v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Jones v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Finn v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. PattonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. S. Hoover v. S.A. Stine, PennDOT and the Borough of WaynesboroCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. E.P. Schmidt as the Administratrix of the Estate of G.J. Schmidt v. PA DOT; ~ Appeal of: DOTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. F.P. Polesky, Jr. and G. Polesky v. PennDOT and G.M. SmithCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. T. Washington v. Commonwealth of PA and City of Philadelphia T. Washington v. PennDOT ~ Appeal of: T. WashingtonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API