Halliday v. Burlington Transp. Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
COLLET, District Judge.
By its motion to quash the service upon it, defendant challenges the constitutionality of Section 5279, Laws Mo.1931, p. 316, Mo.St.Ann. § 5279, p. 6694.1 It is *109asserted that the statute is deficient under the due process clause of the Federal Constitution (Amendment 14, Section 1) and the corresponding provision of the Missouri Constitution (Article 2; Section 30, Mo.St.Ann.), in that it provides for service on motor carriers (whether an individual or a corporation) by service upon the Secretary of the Public Service Commission without any requirement that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Washington Ex Rel. Bond & Goodwin & Tucker, Inc. v. Superior Court of Wash. for Spokane Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Badger Dome Oil Co. v. HallamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harris v. Bates Ex Rel. CurrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Crump v. TreadwaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955