Legal Opinion
Adler v. Pilot Industries, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1948PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.
Tie questions presented on this motion are whether interest is allowable' on a verdict giving damages for trespass to realty and, if so, from what date interest begins to run. Interest was allowed in the instant case and this motion seeks correction of the verdict' by striking or modifying the award.
It is argued that the instances where interest has been allowed are not true trespass cases but actions on covenants to. hold harmless. (Sciaky v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc., 277 N. Y. 483; Weprin & Glass Bldg. Corp. v. Rosoff Subway Constr. Co., 269 N. Y. 672.) And that the rule in actions for.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Flamm v. NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Duryee v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Sciaky v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Weprin & Glass Building Corp. v. Rosoff Subway Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,479 Samuel Mallis and Franklyn B. Kupferman, Cross-Appellants v. Bankers Trust Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- De Long Corp. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Larsen v. A.C. Carpenter, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Morse v. Swank, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- De Long Corp. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.