Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1899PublishedCited by 13 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. J. C. McReynolds and W. Ii. WilliamsoN for Complainant.

1Opinion of the Court

McAlister, L

The Safe Deposit, Trust & Banking Company, in October, 1893, made an assignment for the benefit of creditors to 'W. H. Mitchell. The assignee executed a bond for the faithful performance of his duties, payable to the State of Tennessee in the penalty of $50,000, with personal sureties.

The present bill is filed by a stockholder in sáid Safe Deposit, Trust & Banking Company against Mitchell and the sureties on his bond, to recover money alleged to have been lost by the negligence and maladministration of the said as-signee. The caption of the "bill recites that it is “filed in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Plimpton v. . BigelowNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Parker v. Bethel Hotel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State ex rel. Memphis v. ButlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
  4. State v. MorristownTennessee Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brock v. . PoorNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Lewis Ex Rel. Citizens Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  3. Burns v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  4. McCampbell v. Fountain Head RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Range v. Tennessee Burley Tobacco Growers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API