Legal Opinion

Jason v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 9, 1970No. 346, September Term, 1969PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.

Tyrone O’Neal Jason, Wilbur Allen Johnson and William Francis Moore (appellants) first ask on this appeal: “Did not the trial court err by holding trial under a faulty indictment?” The indictment to which they refer was No. 5332, charging trespass. It was jointly tried with other indictments against them. We dispose of this question by noting that it is pointless, the argument in support of the contention presented by it is meaningless, and the relief sought in connection with it — a reversal or, in the alternative, a “remand to secure a proper indictment for retrial” — is incongruous. The…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. Henson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Jordan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Folk v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Garrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. State v. AllenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  4. Palmer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. FrongilloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API