Legal Opinion
Perry v. United Parcel Service
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 30, 2004No. 03-5861PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This pro se Tennessee litigant appeals a district court judgment dismissing his complaint. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Seeking to recover $550,000 in lost pay, Taft J. Perry, Jr., sued his former employer, United Parcel Service (UPS), alleging that on January 22, 1990, his employment was wrongfully terminated. Perry did not identify any specific state or federal law that was violated with respect to his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wells v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Vivian J. Scheid v. Fanny Farmer Candy Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Alan Weiner, D.P.M. v. Klais and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Prater v. City of BurnsideCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Liquidating Trustee of the Amcast Unsecured Creditor Liquidating Trust v. Baker (In Re Amcast Industrial Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Cousins v. CitiFinancial Mortgage Co. (In Re Cousins)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- Simmerman v. Ocwen Financial & Mortgage Services, Inc. (In re Simmerman)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Adu-Beniako v. Medical Board of California (MDC)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Albury v. Strategic Staffing SolutionsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.