Public Service Railaway Co. v. Banker
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeals from decrees of the court of chancery advised bir Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinions are reported in 92 N. J. Eq. MS, 372.
1Dissent
Mtnturn, Jh
I dissent from the views of the learned vice-chancellor in the court below for the following reasons:
The bill was filled by a legally constituted street railway company, operating under a legislative franchise, as a common carrier of passengers, on the streets of Newark, Elizabeth and Perth Amboy, to enjoin the defendants from illegally interfering with its charter rights. It charges that the defendants have not procured the prescribed municipal consent to operate jitney buses upon the streets of such cities, and that they are operating such buses and collecting fares for the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- California v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- City of Owensboro v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Central Pacific Railroad v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.