Legal Opinion

State v. Tagas

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 3, 2004No. 51382-6-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

A police officer, before giving appellant Kristin Tagas a ride in a patrol car, obtained Tagas’ consent to search her purse. Tagas argues her consent was not voluntary because the officer did not inform her of her right to refuse consent. Under article I, section 7 of Washington’s Constitution, notification of the right to refuse consent to a search is required in the context of “knock and talk” investigations, but not in the circumstances of this case. We affirm the conviction for possession of cocaine.

Officer Blessum stopped a pickup truck for erratic driving on the freeway when she saw it…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. State v. TagasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. State v. WitherriteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. State Of Washington v. Sean C. KellyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API