Legal Opinion

Paulus v. Reed

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 12, 1903PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery District Court. — HoN. N. W.. Maoy, Judge. Action in equity -by plaintiff, as guardian of Tunis Van Horn, a person of unsound mind, praying that his said ward be decreed to be the owner in fee simple of certain real estate, that the defendant be decreed to have no-right or title thereto, and that title be quieted in said Tunis Van Horn. There was a decree in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Bisbop, O. J.

At the time of the trial Tunis Van Horn was about forty-two years of age. Some years ago the father of said Tunis conveyed to him a farm consisting of one hundred and sixty acres. This was done, as testi-fi¿d to by the mother of Tunis (the father now being dead), that he might have something for his support, to take care of himself. There was no other consideration. A short time thereafter, and about ten years ago, Tunis married Sarah Reed, a daughter of the defendant, then a young woman of about twenty-four years of age. They went to live together upon the farm. During the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MorphySupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Spargur v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  3. Elwood v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. Campbell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  5. Earhart v. HolmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stiles v. BreedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Sullivan ex rel. Orton v. KenneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Etchen v. the Texas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Pritchard v. HuttonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Mitchell v. MutchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API