Legal Opinion

Sluka v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 14, 1929No. 27,423PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

In this action to vacate an assessment of benefits imposed on plaintiffs’ land in proceedings for the repair of a county ditch and to restrain the collection of the resulting tax, plaintiffs appeal from an adverse judgment.

The case involves county ditch No. 8 of Kandiyohi county. The findings establish the legality of the proceedings for its establishment and that the land of plaintiffs was assessed for benefits and the assessment paid. There is a like finding concerning the subsequent proceeding for the repair and improvement of the ditch, to the effect that the county board determined that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. State v. WeyerhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  4. Township of Walker v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Vandersyde v. People ex rel. RaymondIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mixed Local of Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union Local No. 458 v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees International Alliance & Bartenders International League of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Larson v. Freeborn CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. County of Ramsey v. Lincoln Fort Road Housing Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API