Legal Opinion

Hicks Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 27, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaeey, J.

The appellant, plaintiff below, filed the following complaint:

“The plaintiff, for its cause of action against the defendant, alleges:
“First. That the plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Louisiana, and is engaged in the wholesale grocer business in said State, with its principal office in Shreveport, Louisiana, and branch office at Minden, Louisiana.
“Second. The defendant is a banking corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the United States, with its principal office in St. Louis, Missouri, and was, at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Federal Land Bank of St. Louis v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Rainwater v. Fed. Reserve Bk. of St. LouisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Bank of Keo v. Bank of CabotSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. RaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Massey-Harris Harvester Co. v. Federal Reserve BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Safety Motors, Inc. v. Elk Horn Bank & Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1954
  3. Lister v. First National Bank of Van BurenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Osage National Bank v. Federal Reserve BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API