Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Berryhill
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 28, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2017-2846Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL HENDERSON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-2846 (CKK) ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (October 28, 2019) Plaintiff Michael Henderson brings this suit seeking review of Defendant Commissioner Andrew Saul’s final administrative decision denying his claim for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Pending before the Court are Mr. Henderson’s Motion for Judgment of Reversal, ECF No. 14, and the Commissioner’s Motion for Judgment of Affirmance and…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Donna J. Clifford v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.