Legal Opinion

Haggins v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 24, 2008No. 26463PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The State petitioned the Court of Appeals pursuant to Rule 227, SCACR, for a writ of certiorari to review a circuit court order granting respondent’s application for post-conviction relief (PCR). The Court of Appeals denied the State’s petition by letter without issuing a formal order or opinion. 1 We granted the State’s petition for a writ of certiorari made pursuant to Rule 226, SCACR, to review the Court of Appeals’ denial and now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. We hold that, as a matter of policy, we will not entertain Rule 226 petitions where the Court of Appeals has exercised…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Re Exhaustion of State Remedies in Criminal & Postconviction Relief CasesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Douglas v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Dunlap v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LylesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Missouri v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Ellison v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API